Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Furst

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1950No. Civ. 7777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $7,500 in favor of plaintiff, after a verdict by a jury, in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of negligence on the part of defendant.

The evidence, taken in the aspect most favorable to plaintiff, as it must be by this court, shows that plaintiff was employed by defendant to wash the latter’s automobile, and was instructed by defendant to take the vehicle to a place in an alley where there was a slight slope; that plaintiff parked the ear at the designated place and set the brakes; and that while he was engaged in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Roberts v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Couch v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Brown v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Johnson v. MarquisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estridge v. EstridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API