Legal Opinion

Federation of Parole & Probation Officers v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 1996No. C940419CV; CA A89001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff, Federation of Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO), appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint for a declaratory judgment under ORS 28.010 et seq against Washington County (county) on the ground that county was violating ORS 181.653(1) and an injunction enjoining county from further violations. We reverse.

FOPPO is a labor organization representing the certified parole and probation officers employed by county. County employs approximately 21 certified parole and probation officers as part of its community corrections program, together with four “case monitors” who are not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Trabosh v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Webber v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. INTERNATIONAL HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FOPPO v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API