Legal Opinion

People v. Hegwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2001No. Docket 118373PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant pleaded guilty to three drug offenses. At sentencing, the circuit court chose to ignore the legislative sentencing guidelines that it was required to consider, erroneously stating that the Legislature had overstepped its role. We disagree. Therefore, we remand this case to the circuit court for resentencing.

i

The defendant was charged with sixteen counts of obtaining controlled substances (Soma, Tylenol 4, and Xanax) by fraud. MCL 333.7407(l)(c). The offense is punishable by a maximum term of four years in prison. The information stated an offense date of “December 1998-March…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. ThousandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. PillarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Serino v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. SolmonsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API