Legal Opinion
Pace v. Bonham
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 4, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-05610-WHOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
*1128ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (REVISED)
Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 57
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation dated October 29, 2013 and the Court’s modified order thereon (Docket No. 66), is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Revised), Docket No. 67. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss and DISMISSES the Second Amended Complaint (Revised) WITH PREJUDICE.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this Clean Water Act case allege that defendants Charlton H. Bon-ham…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.