Legal Opinion

Crampton v. Kroger Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 30, 2016No. Case No: 14-14136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 24) AND (DOC. # 25) AND DEEMING MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SHOW CAUSE (DOC. # 30)

Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Tammy Crampton (“Cramp-ton”) and Mary Beth Savage (“Savage”) both worked as grocery store clerks for Kroger. Their immediate supervisor was Maggie Phan. United Food and Commercial Workers Local #876 (“UFCW”) is a labor union that represents Kroger # 576 employees, including Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that their employment is governed by a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hua v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. King v. Accell Schools LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  3. Michigan Radiology Institute, PLLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Saad v. Menards, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Tron It Consulting, Inc. v. Fedex Trade NetworksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API