Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sunderland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1986No. Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Yesawich, Jr., J.
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 1985 and June 6, 1985, which ruled that claimants were entitled to receive benefits.
The common issue raised on these appeals involves the propriety of granting unemployment insurance benefits to employees terminated for recurring tardiness and excessive absenteeism. The facts in each case are essentially undisputed. Claimant Corinthia Sunderland worked as a clerical assistant for the Nassau County Medical Center from June 15, 1981 until July 24, 1984. Difficulty obtaining baby-sitters to tend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of NunesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of OxiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of BossertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gonzales v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of BuyukcekmeceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002