Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Oxios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a]). The board has found that claimant, a messenger for a law firm, provoked his discharge and thus left employment without good cause by refusing to make two deliveries as directed by his employer. The determination as to what transpired between the employer and employee is factual and the issues of fact and credibility involved are…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SunderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Claim of CollazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API