Scarbrough v. Isham

Defendant below, Fred F. Isham, appeals from an adverse decree, based upon a-jury verdict, fixing the boundary line between his property and that of the complainant, James A. Scarbrough.

The principal contention raised by the assignments is that there is no evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that the Chancellor erred in not withdrawing the issues from the jury and in not decreeing in defendant’s favor notwithstanding the verdict.

The defendant, here the appellant, demanded a jury and on the trial submitted a single issue: “Is the old Poland Hollow (Gap) Road and its junction with…