Legal Opinion
Zeek v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 9, 1983No. 82-AB-1731; A26613Published
1Opinion of the Court
672 P.2d 349 (1983)
65 Or.App. 515
Sally ZEEK, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND MOLALLA SCHOOL DISTRICT 35, Respondents.
No. 82-AB-1731; A26613.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted June 15, 1983.
Decided November 9, 1983.
Paul Meadowbrook, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Theresa L. Wright, Salem.
William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Div. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Stanton F. Long, Deputy Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.
No appearance for respondent…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Mallon v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Zeek v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.