Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Card

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1982No. D-17-223, CA A22637PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Husband appeals from a decree dissolving a three-year marriage. He contends that the property division was inequitable, because it awarded wife 57 percent of the value of the marital residence and was based on the respective life expectancies of the parties. Wife cross-appeals. She contends that she should have been awarded.a larger judgment lien against the marital home to offset the disproportionate share of personal property awarded husband and, further, that the valuation of the real property should have been made as of the date of dissolution, rather than the earlier date when husband…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. In Re the Marriage of KeepersMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In re the Marriage of MasseeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Debord v. DebordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API