Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Romo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1967No. Crim. 4158PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Defendant Pete Duran Romo and his codefendants, Searcy and Earl, were inmates of Deuel Vocational Institution. After a knife fight in the institution they were indicted on two charges: count one. assault with intent to commit murder in violation of Penal Code section 217; count two, possession of a deadly weapon by a state prison *591inmate in violation of Penal Code section 4502.1 Searcy pleaded guilty. Romo and Bari were tried.

At the trial the court instructed the jury that it could find the defendants guilty of violating Penal Code section 4501 (assault with a deadly weapon by a state prison…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. BostickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re BranchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Jerry Emanuel POLLARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theo WHITE, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API