Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Missouri City Stone, Inc. v. Peters

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1975No. 74-323Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in the result, but I consider the language of the opinion to state a new concept of jurisdiction, differing from that upon which we based our finding that there was jurisdiction in International Paper Company v. Tidwell, 250 Ark. 623, 466 S.W. 2d 488. The policy reasons given there for construing the statute liberally in favor of jurisdiction did not become, either singly or collectively, a factual basis for the exercise of jurisdiction in Arkansas. They were nothing more than they purported to be — policy reasons for a liberal construction. I submit that the fact that Peters was at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Arkansas Land & Cattle Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Craig v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Nunez v. O. K. ProcessorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API