Legal Opinion

Nickerson v. Bentley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

There was evidence tending to show that the child was hit while standing still midway between the middle line of the highway and the westerly shoulder, while the defendant was driving in a northerly direction. If this evidence were accepted, the defendant was driving in the middle of the highway, or to the left of the middle. With this in mind, the defendant’s counsel seasonably requested that the court instruct the jury as follows:'“The mere fact that Mr. Bentley’s car may have been to the left of the center of the road at the time the child was struck is not in and of itself fault.” No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Burns v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Praded v. MagownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stowe v. HartfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  2. Berounsky v. OgdenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API