Legal Opinion

Fryczynski v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied, complaint reinstated, and new trial granted, in accordance with memorandum herein. All concur, Callahan, J. P., not participating. Memorandum: Plaintiff instituted this action against Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) to recover for personal injuries sustained when she fell from a bus. At the close of plaintiff’s proof defendant moved for judgment on the ground that the bus was not owned by NFTA or driven by its employee, but was instead owned by Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. (Metro), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rosas v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shepardson v. Town of SchodackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Konner v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Bethel v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Hitzfield v. Wilmorite, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Chrislex Staffing Ltd. v. New York State Department of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API