Legal Opinion

May v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1942No. 15394PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 27, 1942. The appellant has failed to comply with the rule of this Court (Rule 8, Section 2) by stating in his brief the "questions involved;" and it is very doubtful if some of the warranted exceptions comply with Rule 4, Section 6.

Waiving all of this, we have carefully read the record herein, and are satisfied with the result of the order of Honorable P.H. Stoll, Circuit Judge, from which this appeal is prosecuted; and we direct that said order, with minor changes and some deletions made by us, be published as the opinion of this Court.

Affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MESSRS.…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larson v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Berry v. SPIGNERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. George v. Municipal Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Taylor v. Town of Atlantic Beach Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API