Legal Opinion
Jane v. Lewandowski v. Occidental Chemical Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1993No. 92-1314PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a claim for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA). Plaintiff-Appellant Jane Lewandowski is the widow of Leo J. Lewandowski, Jr. From June 1951 to May 1976, Mr. Lewandowski was employed by Udylite Corporation. 1 During his employment, Mr. Lewandowski became a vested participant in the retirement plan of Udylite’s parent company, Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corporation. (Hooker now is known as Occidental Chemical Corporation, named Defendant-Appellee in this case.)
The issues are whether plaintiffs claim for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lake v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Custer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Hines v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.