Legal Opinion
BOOKMAN v. KEATING
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 8, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00940Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEVEN BOOKMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-940 (KMW) (SAK) v. OPINION CHRISTOPHER KEATING, et al., Defendants. WILLIAMS, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s sua sponte screening of Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and the Court’s review of Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) Having reviewed the application, this Court finds that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is warranted in this matter, and Plaintiff’s application will be granted. Because Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.