Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Central Oregon Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Defendants assign error of the court in rendering a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the reason that the complaint does not state a cause of action. This is the only assignment of error.

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint, in substance, the following facts:

The corporate character of the defendant bank: that on or about the first day of January, 1920, the defendants employed the plaintiff to care for and feed and look after a band of about 187 head of cattle belonging to one John Hays, and upon which cattle defendant, the Central Oregon Bank, held a mortgage for a large sum of money and at…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Blanchana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Small v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API