Legal Opinion

People v. Houston

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1963No. Crim. 73PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

William Andrew Houston was found guilty by a jury of armed robbery and kidnaping. Although the defendant admits that he has been convicted of 15 other armed robberies, he contends that the jury was mistaken this time.

The appellant took the stand in his own behalf and denied that he had committed the offenses charged ■ this defense was bolstered by written documents and the testimony of witnesses from southern California which showed that the defendant was in the Los Angeles area earlier on the day of the robbery and that if he drove his truck back toward Modesto prior to the crime, he would…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. People v. TealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Guthrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API