Sanders v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CHANDLER, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This case involves whether a trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. (ANS) on the basis of federal preemption for a medical device regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The case turns on whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to classification of the device. A medical device designated as a class II device is subject to state law, whereas a medical device designated as a class III device is entitled to federal preemption.
¶2. William Sanders (Sanders) filed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stroud Ex Rel. Stroud v. Progressive Gulf Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Mobility Medical, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Tiffany Griffin v. Grenada Youth LeagueCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Delois King v. Willie B. KingCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Holly S. Morgan v. MML Investors Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.