Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2010No. 2009-CA-00594-SCTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This case involves whether a trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. (ANS) on the basis of federal preemption for a medical device regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The case turns on whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to classification of the device. A medical device designated as a class II device is subject to state law, whereas a medical device designated as a class III device is entitled to federal preemption.

¶2. William Sanders (Sanders) filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stroud Ex Rel. Stroud v. Progressive Gulf Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  2. Mobility Medical, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Tiffany Griffin v. Grenada Youth LeagueCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  4. Delois King v. Willie B. KingCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  5. Holly S. Morgan v. MML Investors Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API