People v. Kubby
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KOLKEY, J.
The People move to dismiss defendant Steven Wynn Kubby’s cross-appeal from his convictions for possession of psilocyn and mescaline. The People claim that defendant is a fugitive from justice, and as such, has forfeited his right to appeal his convictions.
Numerous felony cases conclude that “a convicted defendant who becomes a fugitive from justice forfeits the right to appeal that conviction.” (People v. Perez (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 302, 308 [279 Cal.Rptr. 915].) But we have not been cited to a California case that addresses this rule in the context of misdemeanor…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- MacPherson v. MacPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. RedingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Puluc-SiqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. B. C.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Hyun Gu KangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Garcia CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.