Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Baldwin County Commission

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 22, 2003No. CIV.A. 87-T-1159-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

It is ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend, filed by plaintiffs on September 11, 2002 (Doc. No. 224), is denied with the following comments.

In a “results” challenge brought under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1973, “The effect of [a] ... voting rule ... can be evaluated by comparing the system with that rule to a system without that rule.” Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874, 880-881, 114 S.Ct. 2581, 2586, 129 L.Ed.2d 687 (1994). Thus, whether the numbered-place requirement and the majority-vote requirement violate § 2…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holder v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Dillard v. Baldwin County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Dillard v. Baldwin County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Dillard v. Chilton County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  3. Dillard v. Chilton County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Dillard v. Baldwin County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
  5. Dillard v. Colbert County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API