Legal Opinion

Rounds v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1999No. 97-35189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider whether the University of Oregon violated the plaintiffs’ free speech and associational rights by requiring them, as a condition of matriculation, to pay incidental fees that contributed to the support of the Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group Education Fund. We hold that the plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights were not violated, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

*1034I

This lawsuit targets the funding of the Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group Education Fund (the “OSPIRG EF”) through incidental, fees (the “Fees”)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rounds v. Oregon State Board Of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. OSU STUDENTS ALLIANCE v. RayDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  3. 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3289, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4252 Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Gary Locke, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Washington State of Washington, a State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Jones v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API