Legal Opinion

Linert v. Foutz (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2016No. 2014-1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, appellees, Ross and Brenda Linert, contend that appellant, Ford Motor Company, is responsible for the severe injuries Ross sustained in a motor-vehicle accident caused when an intoxicated driver, Adrien Foutz, struck Ross’s 2005 Crown Victoria Police Interceptor (“CVPI”) from behind, triggering a fuel-fed fire.

*470{¶ 2} We address the Linerts’ claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury on R.C. 2307.76(A)(2), Ohio’s statute governing manufacturers’ post-market duty to warn consumers of risks associated with a product that are not discovered until after the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gable v. Village of Gates MillsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Crislip v. TCH Liquidating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sattelmyer v. Covidien, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. Linert v. FoutzOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Linert v. Foutz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Sattelmyer v. Covidien, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API