Legal Opinion

Serres v. Department of Retirement Systems

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 2011No. 64362-2-I, 64563-3-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Leach, A.C.J.

¶1 The Washington Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) and King County (County) appeal a determination that settlement payments made to class members as part of a class action settlement qualify as “compensation earnable” within the meaning of RCW 41.40.010(8). They contend the settlement payments do not meet the statutory definition of that term because the County did not pay them as salary or wages. Alternatively, DRS claims that if these payments are “compensation earnable,” every class member owes retirement plan contributions under RCW 41.50.130(1). DRS further claims the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steven & Linda Nichols v. Mccauley Falls, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API