White v. Esmark Apparel, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SENTER, Chief Judge.
This case involves allegations that the plaintiff, Neal White, an employee of the City of Grenada, Mississippi, was injured as a result of defendant’s releasing certain substances into the city sewer system. Mr. White’s spouse later filed a separate loss of consortium action. 1 This cause is now before the court on defendant’s motion to join the City of Grenada, not as an “actual named defendant,” but as a “phantom par ty,” pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14 and 19. 2
DISCUSSION
In support of its motion, defendant argues that in order for it to take advantage of Miss.Code…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Stueve v. American Honda Motors Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Bode v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Anderson v. National Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Williamson v. Elf Aquitaine, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996