Legal Opinion

White v. Esmark Apparel, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided April 20, 1992No. EC90-57-S-D, EC90-122-S-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SENTER, Chief Judge.

This case involves allegations that the plaintiff, Neal White, an employee of the City of Grenada, Mississippi, was injured as a result of defendant’s releasing certain substances into the city sewer system. Mr. White’s spouse later filed a separate loss of consortium action. 1 This cause is now before the court on defendant’s motion to join the City of Grenada, not as an “actual named defendant,” but as a “phantom par ty,” pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14 and 19. 2

DISCUSSION

In support of its motion, defendant argues that in order for it to take advantage of Miss.Code…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stueve v. American Honda Motors Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
  4. Bode v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Anderson v. National Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Williamson v. Elf Aquitaine, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API