Legal Opinion
MAILMAN, ROSS, ETC. v. Edelson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 29, 1982PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
183 N.J. Super. 434 (1982)
444 A.2d 75
MAILMAN, ROSS, TOYES & SHAPIRO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWARD EDELSON, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Somerset County.
Decided March 29, 1982.
Richard Wilde for plaintiff (Romano, Hehl, Romankow & Wilde, attorneys).
John H. Schmidt for defendant (Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys).
DREIER, J.S.C.
This action was brought by an accounting firm seeking injunctive enforcement of a restrictive employment covenant against its former employee, and damages for the employee's alleged breach of that covenant. Thus, on this return date of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. DOYLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Karlin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Foti v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Young v. VegaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.