Hovey's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 124, 145, 150, 156 and 157, Jan. T., 1900, by Mechanics’ National Bank et al., from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 324, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in the Estate of Franklin S. Hovey, Deceased. Exceptions to adjudication.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 124, 145, 150, 156 and 157, Jan. T., 1900, by Mechanics’ National Bank et al., from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 324, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in the Estate of Franklin S. Hovey, Deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. From the adjudication it appeared that the principal controversy before the auditing judge was with reference to the claim of the Merrick Thread Company, a manufacturing company incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts, located at Holyoke, in that state. The decedent was a wholesale and retail commission merchant, duly licensed as…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The exceptions to the conclusions arrived at by the auditing judge were, upon due consideration, dismissed, and the conclusions aforesaid were approved. The assignments of error are nothing more than a repetition of the exceptions dismissed. The argument based on the exceptions has not resulted in a conviction of error in the adjudication. The latter appears to have been carefully considered by the auditing judge and to be well sustained by principle and authority. The decree of the orphans’ court is sustained and the assignments are dismissed.
Decree affirmed and appeals dismissed…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. PiggottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.