Legal Opinion
City of Hogansville v. Farrell Heating & Plumbing Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 11, 1926No. 4957PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The City of Hogansville insists that it is not a proper party defendant. This contention is based upon the theory that the municipality was not a party to the contract entered into with Farrell Heating & Plumbing Co.; that the school board is a separate, distinct, and independent board of school commissioners in whom is vested the control, management, pos*786session, and title of all school property and school funds, not as agents of the City of Hogansville, but as a separate, distinct, and independent board created by the city and elected by the people. And from the above contentions it is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Butts County v. Jackson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- City of Conyers v. Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Citizens Bank v. Rockdale CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Industrial Relations v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- City of Jefferson v. HolderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Sifford v. Waterworks Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- City of Warm Springs v. BullochSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Beverly v. BeverlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.