State v. Valladarez
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This decision construes conflicting statutes to determine if a district magistrate judge has jurisdiction to conduct felony arraignments and accept guilty or no contest pleas to felony charges. Aaron Valladarez, who pled no contest to two felony charges before a district magistrate judge, argues a district magistrate judge does not have this authority and, as a result, his felony convictions are void. In addition, Valladarez argues the sentencing judge committed reversible error by not asking him personally if there was any legal reason…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. EllmakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- In Re the Appeal of the Mental Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.