Legal Opinion

State v. Valladarez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 2009No. 99,724, 99,891PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This decision construes conflicting statutes to determine if a district magistrate judge has jurisdiction to conduct felony arraignments and accept guilty or no contest pleas to felony charges. Aaron Valladarez, who pled no contest to two felony charges before a district magistrate judge, argues a district magistrate judge does not have this authority and, as a result, his felony convictions are void. In addition, Valladarez argues the sentencing judge committed reversible error by not asking him personally if there was any legal reason…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. EllmakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. In Re the Appeal of the Mental Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API