Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant County. Tried below before Hon. Mike E. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

The fifty shares of the capital stock of the Hotel Worth Company in the city of Fort Worth, to recover which appellant instituted this suit, had been pledged to certain banks to secure certain joint debts of appellant and W. P. Hardwick, deceased. W. P. Hardwick subsequently paid said joint debts, as also one or more individual debts of appellant, received said shares of stock, had them marked cancelled, and new certificates thereof issued in his own name. Appellant alleged and testified in effect that said stocks had been surrendered to and acquired by said Hardwick…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. H. Seeligson & Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Harrison v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moore v. Waterbury Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Hines v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Hanover Co., Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Hook v. CraryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. City Nat. Bank of Spur v. Rhome-Farmer Livestock Commission Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API