Legal Opinion
At & T WIRELESS PCS, INC. v. City of Atlanta
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 14, 1999No. 1:98-cv-00962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Damages Claim Under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996[31] and plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Claims for Relief Under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988[32]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that each of plaintiffs motions should be DENIED. Additionally, plaintiffs Motion to Strike and Notice of Objection to Settlement Evidence [35] is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nextel Partners Inc. v. Kingston TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Sandusky County v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- AT&T Wireless PCS Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Nextel Partners Inc. v. Kingston TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002