Legal Opinion

Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2001No. 00-0041PublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

In this case, we must decide whether the discovery rule applies to oil and gas royalty owners’ claims that the lease operator deducted improper gas gathering and compression charges from the gas purchase price, thus reducing the amount paid as royalties. The court of appeals held that the discovery rule applied to defer accrual of the royalty owners’ claims because their injury was both inherently undiscoverable and objectively verifiable. 61 S.W.3d 1. Because we conclude that the nature of the royalty owners’ injury was not inherently undiscoverable, we hold that the discovery rule does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Horwood v. Wagner & Brown, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999

3Cited by296 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. BP America Production Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Beavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Valdez v. HollenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 2015

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API