Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1963No. Calendar 15, Docket 49,168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentKelly, J.

Plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile driven by her husband, suffered injury as the result of a collision between the automobile in which she was riding and a diesel switch engine (without cars attached) owned and operated by defendant railroad company.

Suits were instituted by both plaintiff wife and her husband, claiming defendant (1) negligently propelled the switch engine onto the highway knowing the operator “could not see oncoming traffic from the south”; (2) propelled “its diesel switch engine at a high, dangerous and unlawful rate of speed”; and (3) failed “to ring the engine bell or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dalton v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Smith v. OrmistonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Geeck v. LuckenbillMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Grodi v. MierowMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeCorte v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API