Legal Opinion
Arnold v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 13, 2020No. 5:19-cv-04223Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-04223-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 11 Defendants. 12 In this action, Marie Arnold (“Plaintiff”) alleges that the United States of America and the 13 Central Intelligence Agency (collectively, “Defendants”) engaged in various tortious and criminal 14 acts against her and her daughters. See generally Dkt. 5 (“FAC”). Before the Court is 15 Defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Dkt.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.