Cheyney v. Smith
Arizona Supreme Court
ORIGINAL Application for Writ of Mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The plaintiff herein applies to this court for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as territorial treasurer, to pay the amount of a certain warrant drawn by the territorial auditor in favor of plaintiff, as authorized by subdivision 15 of section 1 of an act commonly known *144as the “Appropriation Bill,” passed by the fifteenth legislative assembly, and approved by the governor on the tenth day of April, 1889. This action is brought for the purpose of having a judicial determination as to the validity of said act, it being contended that at the date of the passage and approval…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Edward's Lessee v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Clinton v. EnglebrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- City of Lexington v. McQuillan's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanson v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- County of Maricopa v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1895
- Knapp v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Arizona Power Co. v. StuartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Territory v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915