Legal Opinion

Szomjassy v. Ohm Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 8, 2001No. CIV.A.1:98CV3705CAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PANNE LL, District Judge.

The plaintiff filed the instant action, alleging breach of contract. This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In analyzing a summary judgment motion, the court resolves all issues of fact in favor of the non-movant. See Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir.1996). Therefore, the facts, as stated below, may not prove to be the facts that would be established at trial. See Hartsfield v. Lemacks, 50 F.3d 950, 951 (11th Cir.1995) (citing Rodgers v. Horsley, 39 F.3d 308,…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yocum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Levine v. Cicchinelli (In re Flooring America, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API