Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. Camerlin
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
Introduction
This, interpleader action__js presently bé- •' fore us' 6n cross motions' for, summary judgment filed by an individual claimant, June Walton, and a group of adversary claimants, Patricia Camerlin, Cindy Dishong, Kathleen Hibbert, Terry Lemley and Pamela Kostrej. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335. The facts upon which our opinion rests are not in dispute.
Facts
Jack R. Walton worked for Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (“Bell”) from January 28, 1952 until his retirement on August 25, 1975. On March 22, 1951, Mr. Walton and the woman…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. CamerlinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company of New York, New York v. Charlotte Evanek and Marian Evanek, Marian EvanekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. EvanekDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bloom v. SelfonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Camerlin, Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. Of Philadelphia v. CamerlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.