Legal Opinion
Gould v. Control Laser Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 27, 1978No. 78-344-Orl-Civ-YPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEORGE C. YOUNG, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the court on a number of defense motions which seek, alternatively or cumulatively, to compel the joinder of an additional party plaintiff, to dismiss the complaint and amended complaint, and to grant summary judgment. The court heard argument on the motions on October 18, 1978, and rendered oral rulings from the bench disposing of each motion. This opinion incorporates those rulings and more fully explains the reasons why the court ruled as it did.
I. THE MOTION TO JOIN REFAC AS AN INDISPENSABLE PARTY PLAINTIFF
By this motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cook & Nichol, Inc. v. The Plimsoll Club, Leo S. WeilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gordon Gould and Refac International, Limited, Gordon Gould v. Control Laser Corp., and Holobeam Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- In-TECH MARKETING INC. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Garner v. PearsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.