Wenske v. Ealy
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Memorandum Opinion by
Chief Justice Valdez
Appellants, Benedict 6. and Elizabeth Wenske, challenge the trial court’s grant of traditional summary judgment in their cause of action for declaratory judgment in favor of appellees, Steve and Deborah Ealy. By one issue, appellants contend that as a matter of law they own 3/8ths of the minerals and 3/8ths of the royalties, unburdened by an outstanding l/4th nonparticipating royalty interest (NPRI) belonging to former owners of the property.1 We affirm.
I. Background
In 1988, appellants purchased approximately fifty-five acres from,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Dickey v. Club Corp. of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benedict G. Wenske and Elizabeth Wenske v. Steve Ealy and Deborah EalyTexas Supreme Court · 2017