Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mashaney v. Board of Indigents' Defense Services

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 8, 2013No. 108,353Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAtcheson, J.

I. An Overview

The difficult issue in this case asks how the demonstrable negligence of a lawyer representing a criminal defendant should be remedied through civil tort law. Based on vaporous public policy considerations, most courts addressing the issue require criminal defendants to prove they are “actually innocent” to win legal malpractice claims—an obligation that has no real analog when civil litigants sue their lawyers for negligent representation and no real connection to the harm inflicted. The duty criminal defense lawyers owe their clients has both a constitutional dimension rooted…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API