Legal Opinion

Chun v. Howard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case, founded on a special contract.

The plaintiffs state a contract with the defendants for 150 hogs, with the privilege of delivering 300 at New Castle, Henry county, at a given price, to be paid on delivery. The contract is shown to have been frequently varied, and the sums of 50 dollars and 300 dollars, to have been paid. They then declare that afterwards, &c. when the said hogs were to be delivered, *164and received, the said parties enlarged said contract, and it was agreed that the defendants had then and there 705 hogs, and that the plaintiffs should…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M'Donald v. HewettNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Clarkson v. CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magic Packing Co. v. Stone-Ordean Wells Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API