Legal Opinion

Amezquita v. Hough

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 25, 2019No. 3:19-cv-01461Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSE G. AMEZQUITA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01461-AJB-KSC CDCR #AS-4217, 10 ORDER: Plaintiff, 11 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO 12 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 [ECF No. 2] C/O HOUGH, Correctional Officer; 14 C/O DOWNS, Correctional Officer; 2) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS 15 WARDEN DOE 1; ASSOCIATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) WARDEN DOE 2; SERGEANT DOE 3, AND § 1915A(b)(1) 16 Defendants. 17 AND 18 3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL 19 TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS HOUGH AND 20 DOWNS PURSUANT TO 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API