Legal Opinion

Urbano v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1935No. Civ. 9193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for injuries received in an accident growing out of a collision betwéen a street ear operated by the defendant company and a motorcycle operated by the plaintiff. The major contention of the defendant is that the evidence clearly establishes, as a matter of law, plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

In reviewing the evidence on such an appeal all conflicts must be resolved in favor of the respondent, and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged in to uphold the verdict, if possible. It is an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ching Wing v. KishiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McHugh v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Lunsford v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Glickman v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API