Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Velozo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries — the loss of the plaintiff’s right hand — received while he was in the employ of the defendant. The defendant was engaged in the business of manufacturing sausages. He carried no compensation insurance. The case was tried by a judge and a jury. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s written motion for a directed verdict and his requests for rulings were denied. To these denials, to the granting of one of the plaintiff’s requests for rulings, and to the exclusion of certain evidence, the defendant excepted.

This was the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Field v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Everson v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Boyd v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Boyd v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. Chin KeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Employment Security v. BartelsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API