Legal Opinion

Hardin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1969No. A-14588PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIX, Judge.

The Plaintiffs in Error were charged by information in the Court of Common Pleas of Oklahoma County with the crime of Aggravated Assault. They were tried before a jury, found guilty and assessed defendant’s with a fine of $250.00.

The chief complaint of defendant’s regard the admission of other offenses which defendant’s claim constitute reversible error. The alleged error arose during cross-examination of defendant Piatt by the State’s Attorney, and in the following manner:

“Q. Have you been in any fights?

MR. GAY: Object as incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial.

THE COURT: Overruled.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Bunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Ruhm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. State v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Belk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API