Legal Opinion

Paternity of R.J.S. v. Stockton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2008No. 47A05-0712-JV-678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Robert and Linda Mullen appeal the dismissal of their petition to establish paternity of R.J.S. We affirm.

Issue

The dispositive issue is whether the Mullens, as alleged paternal grandparents, have standing to seek an order establishing paternity of R.J.S.

Facts

R.J.S. was born on April 23, 2005, to Amanda Stockton. Amanda represented to the Mullens that their son, Ryan Mullen, was the child’s father. Ryan had died on February 2, 2005. Anthony and Mary Stockton, Amanda’s parents, were named R.J.S.’s guardians.

On July 25, 2007, the Mullens filed a petition to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Steinke v. CoridenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Zoucha Ex Rel. D.H. v. HennNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Blimpie Internatinal, Inc. v. ChoiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. B.A.T. v. S.K.D.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Paternity of G.J.C. and C.E.C. J.T. v. N.R. and R.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. R.J. v. V.N.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Todd Cooper v. Mark VanGilder, Leah Donohue, William Donohue, and Mary VanGilder (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API