Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Steinke v. Coriden
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 2005No. 49A04-0408-CV-435PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, J.
Thomas Steinke appeals the trial court's determination that he lacks standing to seek an order of mandate. Steinke presents two issues, which we consolidate and restate as follows: Does an attorney who practices before the Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana (the Board) have standing to seek an order of mandate directing members of the Board to adhere to certain statutory guidelines?
We affirm.
The undisputed facts are that Steinke is an Indiana attorney whose practice includes representing employees before the Board. On March 4, 2004, Steinke filed a Verified Complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamilton v. State ex rel. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
- Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Sims v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hayes v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Common Coun. Mi City v. Bd. of Zoning App.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hendricks County Board of Commissioners v. Rieth-Riley Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Liberty Landowners Ass'n v. Porter County CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Perry v. BallewIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.