Legal Opinion

Reutzel v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2005No. 24 WAP 2004PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

The issue in this case is whether the Superior Court erred in enforcing a settlement agreement between Appellants Rozanna and Mark Reutzel and Appellees Dr. Richard Douglas, M.D., and Allegheny General Hospital (“AGH”) based on its conclusion that the Reutzels’ attorney had apparent authority to settle the case on the Reutzels’ behalf. For the following reasons, we conclude that it did err and therefore reverse.

On November 28, 1994, Mark Reutzel and his wife Rozanna were traveling along an interstate highway in the family’s mini-van when Mark lost control of the vehicle,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Archbishop v. KARLAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Starling v. West Erie Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RueySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Salsman v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Jones v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Brannam v. ReedyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API