Legal Opinion
Di Maio v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 15, 1985No. Motion No. M-31970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold E. Koreman, P. J.
According to the allegations contained in the proposed claim herein, in October 1968 claimant Victor J. Di Maio, a Viet Nam war veteran, consulted with and received advice from Bruce Hess, a counselor with the New York State Division of Veterans’ Affairs {see, Executive Law art 17), regarding an application for disability benefits. Pursuant to instructions received from Mr. Hess, Mr. Di Maio secured medical documents in support of his disability claim and completed the necessary forms. The papers were then submitted to the counselor who was to file…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flushing National Bank v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Flushing National Bank v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1992
- Harkin v. CulletonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Frasier v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2005